FMS Web site bannerAbout FMS Banner Tab Read FMS Web site privacy policy Skip to Main Content Department of the Treasury Web site About FMS Main Page
 

 Home Q&A's Calendar Publications Programs About FMS Site Map A-Z Index Help

   
 
  Find:    Advanced Search Tools: Print RSS Email
 

white arrow FMS Overview

white arrow All About FMS

white arrow Navigating the FMS Web Site

white arrow Organizational Charts

white arrow Fact Sheets

white arrow Strategic Plan

white arrow Legislative & Public Affairs

white arrow Locations & Directions

white arrow Doing Business with FMS

Working at FMS
white arrow Overview
white arrow EEO Policy Statement (PDF)
white arrow EEO Complaint Process (PDF)
white arrow Reasonable Accommodations
    Procedures (PDF)

white arrow Glossary

white arrow Contacts

white arrow Click here to learn more about RSS/XML on the FMS Web site RSS

About the Financial Management Service

Strategic Plan For Fiscal Years 2003-2008

Appendices to the FMS Strategic Plan


Appendix A. FMS' Long Range Strategic Performance Goals/Measures

As part of FMS’ strategic direction, we have identified several long-term goals/measures and have developed associated targets for each goal/measure. This effort establishes outyear targets and provides additional guidance/direction to the entire organization. These long-term goals/measures support major mission activities. As we continue through the period covered by this plan, these goals/measures may be revised and/or changed as a result of business environment changes. The targets listed in this appendix are set for 2010.

Payments

Ninety percent of all payments will be made electronically.

Collections

Ninety percent of the dollar amount of all collections will be made electronically Sixty percent of all collection transactions will be made electronically.

Debt Collection

There will be $3.5 billion dollars collected annually from delinquent debt referrals.

Governmentwide Accounting and Reporting

Federal Program Agencies will have simplified and streamlined access to FMS' central (governmentwide) accounting information through a single access point.

All central (governmentwide) accounting information will be available within twenty-four hours/one business day of the transaction.

Appendix B. FMS' Strategic Management Process

Planning, Budgeting and Reporting

FMS’ strategic management process reflects the vision of the Commissioner and the FMS senior management team and engages the executive level planning team in a continuous planning effort. This continuous effort focuses on evaluating the nature of the business; articulating a futuristic vision for how FMS business will be conducted; defining long-term goals; developing realistic objectives and strategies to reach those goals; aligning those goals and objectives with our budget and with Department of the Treasury's Strategic Plan; establishing performance measures; and allocating resources appropriately to carry out the goals, objectives and strategies. This effort embodies inclusiveness and participation from FMS managers, employees, customers and stakeholders. Accountability for the strategic plan is twofold: 1) tactical or action level plans that are in alignment with the strategic plan; and 2) Senior Executive Service Performance Plans.

Set strategic goals and priorities for the long-term. FMS’ Strategic Plan sets goals, objectives and strategies to guide the entire organization. It also serves as the baseline for the development of tactical or action level plans, performance goals, annual plans, and budget initiatives. As with all other government agencies, FMS operates in an environment (e.g., political, economic, social) that is constantly changing. These changes may affect FMS’ ability to meet its goals and objectives. As a result, FMS’ Strategic Plan includes descriptions of the external factors that may affect our ability to achieve our goals.

Set annual performance targets. FMS has formatted its budget submission to serve as both a budget request and as the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) performance plan. The performance goals included in the budget submission drive program decision-making and serve to justify the resource request. We derive the performance goals and targets presented in the budget justification from the strategic goals presented in the strategic plan.

Manage and budget to achieve those targets. FMS links program results and budget activities to fulfill GPRA requirements. FMS has four budget activities that link functions to FMS? current performance measures and our strategic goals: Payments, Collections, Debt Collection, and Governmentwide Accounting and Reporting. The budget activities represent the major activities that support the FMS mission.

Systematically report on annual performance. FMS’ annual budget submission also includes the annual performance report required by GPRA. Annually, we compare actual performance with the estimated targets, and we provide explanations for the differences between planned and actual target levels.

Linking General Goals and Objectives to Annual Performance Goals

The FMS implementation of GPRA links the FMS Strategic Plan, the Annual Performance Plans and Reports, and the budget. Our performance goals in the budget/Annual Plans and Reports are identical to our strategic goals and objectives in the strategic plan.

Appendix C. Summary table depicting the linkage between the Treasury goals and objectives and FMS' goals, objectives and performance goals. 1

Treasury Goals and Objectives FMS Goals, Objectives and Performance Goals
Goal: Manage the Government's Finances Effectively.

Objective:

  • Collect federal tax revenue when due, through fair and uniform application of the law.

  • Manage federal debt effectively and efficiently.

  • Make collections and payments on time and accurately, optimizing use of electronic mechanisms.

  • Optimize cash management and effectively administer the government’s financial systems.

The following FMS Goals, as described below, support this Treasury Goal.

Goal 1. Provide federal payments timely and accurately, move toward an all-electronic Treasury for payments, and determine the optimal payment processing environment for the future.

Goal 2. Provide timely collection of federal government receipts, at the lowest cost, through an all-electronic Treasury.

Goal 3. Maximize collection of government delinquent debt by providing efficient and effective centralized debt collection services.

Goal 4. Produce accurate, accessible, and timely governmentwide financial information and reports which contribute to improved quality of the nation's financial decision making.

Goal 5. Facilitate the achievement of a clean audit opinion on the Financial Report of the United States Government through FMS’ internal operations and support to government agencies.

Ensure Professionalism, Excellence, Integrity, and accountability in the Management and Conduct of the Department of Treasury.

Objective:

  • Protect the Integrity of the Department of Treasury.

  • Manage Treasury Resources Effectively to Accomplish the Mission and Provide Quality Customer

All of FMS' Goals, as described below, support this Treasury Goal.

Goal 1. Provide federal payments timely and accurately, move toward an all-electronic Treasury for payments, and determine the optimal payment processing environment for the future.

Goal 2. Provide timely collection of federal government receipts, at the lowest cost, through an all-electronic Treasury.

Goal 3. Maximize collection of government delinquent debt by providing efficient and effective centralized debt collection services.

Goal 4. Produce accurate, accessible, and timely governmentwide financial information and reports which contribute to improved quality of the nation's financial decision making.

Goal 5. Facilitate the achievement of a clean audit opinion on the Financial Report of the United States government through FMS’ internal operations and support to government agencies.

Goal 6. Establish policies and processes to facilitate the integration of e-commerce technologies into FMS' business programs and infrastructure.

1. Our performance goals in the Annual Performance Plans and Reports are identical to our strategic goals presented here and in the strategic plan. The Annual Performance Plan and Reports include measurable, outcome-oriented performance goals that clearly describe and relate how goal/objective achievement will be measured.

Appendix D. Coordination on Cross-Cutting Issues

This table highlights key partners that FMS must coordinate with to achieve its strategic goals:

Key Partners Goal 1
Payments
Goal 2
Collections
Goal 3
Debt Collection
Goal 4
Governmentwide Financial Information & Reports
Goal 5
Unqualified Financial Reports
Goal 6
Electronic Commerce
Department of the Treasury x x x x x x
Congress x x x x x x
Federal Reserve System x x x x x x
Financial Institutions (Banking System) x x   x   x
Office of Management and Budget x x x x x x
General Accounting Office x x x x x x
Federal Program Agencies x x x x x x
National Treasury Employees Union x x x x x x
Federal Credit Policy Working Group     x      
Chief Financial Officers Council     x x x  
Governmentwide Accounting Advisory Group       x    
Standard General Ledger Board       x x  
Private Collection Agencies     x      
Recipients of Federal Payments x          
Consumer/Community-Based Organizations x         x
Government Vendors x         x
Joint Financial Management Improvement Program         x  
State Governments     x      
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board         x  

Appendix E. Use of Program Evaluations to Develop Strategic Plan

A number of ongoing and one-time program evaluations/audits have influenced FMS goals, objectives and strategies. FMS accomplishes program evaluations through a variety of sources: internal reviews conducted by individual program offices; reviews and audits performed by Treasury’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and reviews conducted by the General Accounting Office (GAO). The more significant evaluations/audits used to develop this strategic plan include:

Issue/Program
Program Evaluations
Computer Security/All Programs The Need to Improve Computer Security Controls (GAO/AIMD-99-10): The need for an entity-wide security program is an FMS priority and will serve to address weaknesses in computer security planning and management.
Self-Assessments & Certification/Accreditation/All Programs NIST 800-26 Self-Assessments & Certification/Accreditation: FMS reviewed its programs and entity-wide IT security program in accordance with the definition of a Program Review in OMB 02-29. The FMS IT Security Oversight & Compliance Staff and C&A facilitators from the Mission Assurance Division conducted Reviews of C&A documents. Additionally, a review of the FMS IT Security Program was conducted by the Treasury Enterprise IT Security Planning and Assurance Staff; three reviews of FMS’ Plan of Action and Milestones submissions were completed.
Effective Cash Controls Audit of Financial Management Service's Fiscal Years 2002 and 2001 Schedules of Non-Entity Government-wide Cash (OIG-03-039): FMS has established policies and procedures designed to strengthen controls over the governmentwide operating cash.
Effective Internal Controls/All Programs Management Letter for Fiscal Year 2002 Audit of Schedule of Non-Entity Government- Wide Cash (OIG-03-040): FMS has designed and is implementing an action plan to resolve internal control issues related to FMS general controls over the systems used to administer the governmentwide cash.
Effective Internal Controls/All Programs Management Letter for Fiscal Year 2002 Audit of Schedule of Non-Entity Assets, Non- Entity Costs and Custodial Revenue (OIG-03-43): FMS has designed and is implementing an action plan to resolve internal control issues related to FMS’ general controls over the systems used to administer the Treasury Managed Accounts.
Improved Financial Information/Governmentwide Reporting and Accounting Management Letter for Fiscal Year 2002 Audit of Schedule of Non-Entity Assets, Non-Entity Cost and Custodial Revenue (OIG-03-042): FMS has implemented an action plan designed to improve the financial analysis of fluctuation on a regular basis in an effort to identify trends in the Treasury Managed Accounts. In addition, the action plan will improve its accrual process to effectively identify cut offs for selected Treasury Managed Accounts.
Program Review/All Programs Program review of Information Resources area within FMS to determine optimum organizational structure for development of web-based systems under the governmentwide e-commerce initiative. Study conducted under the direction of the Commissioner's Office by a consultant, McKinsey & Co. This study, carried out during fiscal year 02, resulted in a major restructuring of FMS’ Information Resources (IR) organization with increased emphasis on security and customer support, and a change in system development strategy. Two IR divisions were abolished; displaced employees were assigned to other program areas engaged in system development efforts. Program areas were delegated responsibility for IT project management. Emphasis has been placed on competitive outsourcing, project management training and development; and procurement strategies to expedite required contractor support and services. Additionally, a Division Information Officer Council was formed with representatives from each of the Assistant Commissioner organizations, to establish IT policies, standards, and to review, approve or recommend approval/disapproval of new systems development.
IT Internal Controls/All Programs Physical and Environmental IT Reviews: FMS IT Specialist, Security Specialists and Program Office representatives conduct reviews to determine the adequacy of internal controls related to IT and physical securities at the various FMS sites and servicing banks that act as our financial agents. Additional internal controls have been identified and implemented and corrective actions are developed, monitored and spot checked for compliance.
Optimal Payment Process/Payments Checks Outstanding Reconciliation Procedures Assessment: An independent assessment by a public accounting firm was conducted to determine whether system reconciliation procedures were adequate and controls were in place to correctly identify the amount of outstanding checks. FMS received an independent verification that FMS has improved the monthly outstanding check reconciliation process; that procedures were reasonable and controls were in place to prevent or detect a material misstatement of the balance of outstanding checks; and that an adequate audit trail was maintained.
Program Analysis/Debt Collection then all remaining programs Program Assessment Rating Tool [PART]: FMS has completed its assessment of its debt management program. Other FMS programs will be assessed within the next several years.

During the period 2000-2005, program evaluations and audits in areas such as Governmentwide Accounting, Debt Collection, Payments, Collections, Electronic Commerce and Human Resources have been proposed by the OIG, individual program offices, and others. Proposed evaluations or audits in these areas have the potential to assess the effectiveness and impact of various FMS strategic goals, objectives, strategies and programs.

Additionally, FMS continuously reviews and evaluates its programs. Included in the review process are periodic and spot reviews related to lockbox operations, certification and accreditation of all information technology systems and management annual assurances in compliance with the Federal Financial Integrity Act and the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act.

Appendix F. Data Validation

FMS links program results and budget activities to fulfill the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) requirements. FMS has four budget activities (business lines) that link functions to FMS’ current performance measures and our strategic goals. For each performance measure presented in FMS’ Annual Performance Plans and Reports, a description of the systems and internal controls used for data verification and validation is included. For fiscal year 2003, the data from all the relevant FMS systems is rated at “Reasonable Accuracy.” This means that the program managers have determined that the information from the systems is sufficiently accurate for program management and performance reporting purposes.

Appendix G. Management Challenges--Index of Goals and Strategies Related to FMS' GAO-and IG-Identified Management Challenges

I. Management Challenge: Strengthen FMS' Computer Security Controls (GAO 03-109)

Issue: FMS' entitywide security control structure has yet to fully address the significant risks associated with its current and evolving computing environment. As FMS provides users greater and easier access to larger amounts of data and system resources, well-designed and effective computer security controls are essential if FMS’s operations and computer resources are to be properly protected.

Related Goal: Cross-cutting throughout all goals.

Actions:

To ensure an effective entity-wide Information Technology (IT) Security Program, FMS has:

1. Revised and published information technology security policies and standards and trained employees on the new policies.

2. Appointed a senior executive to oversee audit findings, evaluate its entitywide security program using the Federal IT Security Assessment Framework, and implement a program plan and milestones to achieve a security program effectiveness of Level 5 by fiscal year 2004.

3. Addressed the resolution of audit findings and recommendations through a comprehensive corrective action plan that includes detailed milestones. FMS has completed all 55 corrective actions.

II. Management Challenge: Ability to Prepare Reliable Financial Statements (GAO 03-109)

Issue: Federal agencies have been cited as having problems related to fundamental record keeping, incomplete documentation, and weak internal controls which prevent the government from accurately reporting a large portion of assets, liabilities, and cost. GAO reaffirmed these deficiencies in their audit of the consolidated fiscal year 2002 Financial Report of the United States government.

Related Goal: Facilitate the achievement of a clean audit opinion on the Financial Report of the U.S. Government through FMS? internal operations and support to government agencies.

Related Objectives:

To strengthen federal financial management by improving the quality, timeliness, accuracy, delivery and integrity of government financial information and reporting.

To increase program efficiencies and reduce reporting and operational burdens by converting paper-based processes to electronic processes and by using new technologies.

To facilitate the development of a knowledgeable federal financial community.

Actions:

In fiscal year 2003, FMS will finalize requirements and obtain contractual assistance in its effort to rebuild the processes it uses to prepare the Financial Report of the U.S. Government. The new process will be used in preparing thefiscal year 2004 financial statements, scheduled for publication in December 2004. When implemented, the new process and business rules will mitigate the material weakness in the current process.

Appendix H. Security and Continuity of Operations

FMS is well equipped to ensure uninterrupted service in the event of a disaster, natural or otherwise. A back-up data center has recently been built out at FMS’ Kansas City, MO, Financial Center. This center provides full recovery capability for the bureau’s payments applications and serves as a backup for the Bureau of the Public Debt’s systems. The Federal Reserve and a commercial recovery site provide support for all other applications and all applications run by the Federal Reserve are fully backed up. In addition, IBM provides back up for our non-payment systems.

The physical security of FMS' facilities, as well as the security of its employees, has also been enhanced since September 11, 2001. FMS has implemented the following security measures:

  • Increased the level of physical security at its facilities by increasing guard patrol, providing additional structural security, conducting vulnerability reviews, and maintaining emergency supplies
  • Implemented Emergency Planning, with an alert cast system, Emergency Information Cards, a 1- 800 phone number, Continuity of Operations (COOP)/evacuation testing, business continuity planning and threat level descriptions and actions
  • Improved the mechanisms for emergency communications, including purchasing a satellite phone system, using a standardized cellular phone system with paging throughout FMS, and installing satellite and cable TV

Appendix I. The Human Capital Challenge

Given FMS’ current and anticipated future mission, our core occupations will be changing dramatically away from routine operations toward more development of customer-focused systems and value-added analysis of critical financial data. Also, as reflected in the goals and objectives delineated elsewhere in this Strategic Plan, technological change is heavily impacting the occupational skill sets needed to meet these objectives. From a strategic human capital perspective, the challenge is both quantitative (being able to quickly and efficiently hire a sufficient number of skilled employees) and qualitative (developing and retaining current employees).

To help meet this workforce challenge, FMS has established a Human Capital Management Council to serve as a collection point for workforce information, and has prepared a Human Capital Plan describing FMS’ human capital goals, objectives, investments and strategies. A human capital action plan links the Human Capital Plan to specific human capital initiatives. Some of the major areas of focus include:

Future Skill Needs
Our core occupations have traditionally included Accountants, Computer Specialists, Financial Program Specialists, and now includes the emerging inter-disciplinary occupation of Project Manager. These occupations require strong occupationally specific technical skills: understanding of accounting principles, knowledge of financial concepts, a variety of computer skills in various specialties, and strong organizational and management skills. These conditions have produced a profound occupational skill gap, so that we foresee our core occupations dramatically changing, as well as the way we do business (e-commerce, web-based transactions, and information/data flow). Therefore, our challenge is to recruit and retain employees capable of leading these evolutionary changes. To meet this challenge, FMS’ Human Capital Management Council has embarked on an effort to identify organizational and occupational competencies for our core and critical occupations. These competencies will provide a skill-based framework for the recruitment, development, and evaluation of our future workforce.

Workforce/Succession Planning
With respect to succession planning, an overarching consideration is the organizational culture that exists within the agency. Within FMS, the executive management team (Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, and Assistant Commissioners) considers succession planning an integral part of their responsibilities, and these considerations permeate much of the decision process relative to staffing and development. There are specific recruitment and developmental programs that are components of a progressive succession planning approach; however, a key factor is that most of the Assistant Commissioners have worked in a variety of the program areas. As a result, decisions concerning the development and placement of individuals into key positions are made with a view toward FMS-wide needs as opposed to a more parochial view. Recently, new competitive programs have been established to identify and develop new supervisors and managers, SES candidates, and certified project managers. Each of these areas has a curriculum of required formal training and provides structured developmental experiences in the workplace.

Recruitment Programs
As stated previously, FMS is facing both a quantitative and qualitative challenge in attracting and retaining a highly skilled workforce. Based upon current and future demographic projections and the need to be able to effectively compete for skilled employees, FMS has determined to emphasize entry-level professional hires and the relatively rapid movement of these hires into positions of significant responsibility.

These workforce trends and projections, along with FMS’ strategic approach to recruitment, have been captured in a recruitment plan that describes the variety of efforts underway to hire the new generation of employees. The plan focuses on available tools that can be used to attract the most qualified applicants, while at the same time expanding the recruitment pool to attract a more expansive and diverse group of applicants. For entry-level positions, FMS has increased its visibility at local colleges and universities and expanded the number of schools being regularly visited. We make extensive use of the Federal Career Intern Program, have updated and re-issued brochures and fact sheets, established a Delegated Examining Unit, and established on-going relations with a variety of Black and Hispanic professional and student organizations. FMS has also implemented several new recruitment and retention flexibilities, including recruitment bonuses, retention allowances, and repayment of student loans. This is in addition to ongoing programs to enhance the attractiveness of FMS as a place of employment, including flexible work hours and flexiplace.

Training and Development

FMS is fully committed to continuing and ongoing training of all employees. FMS has developed and is utilizing a unique and planned system of training and development available for employees at all levels. These programs include not only Service-wide Training, available to all employees, which provides courses in computer skills, administration and management, and career decisional subjects. Also included is a full array of professional development programs encompassing a Management Preparatory Development Program (MPD), an Incumbent Manager Development Program (IMD), and a SES Candidate Program. Having identified Project Manager as an emerging critical inter-disciplinary occupation, FMS has developed and put in place a Project Management Training (PMT) curriculum designed to develop highly trained and certified project managers. FMS has also offered all employees five full days of paid training per year (budget permitting) and has reallocated funds to support a higher degree of technical and professional training for employees who are not in a designated competitive program.

Appendix J. Consultations and Stakeholders

This Strategic Plan was developed in accordance with the provisions of the GPRA and OMB Circular A-11. We have shared our initial draft plan with the Department and OMB. Their views and comments are reflected in this draft. We have sent letters to various Congressional Committees, federal program agencies, and the National Treasury Employees Union requesting their review of and comments about our draft plan; and made the plan available at the FMS web site at http://fms.treas.gov/strategicplan/updatedraft2003.html Also, the plan was developed and prepared in its entirety by FMS managers and employees.

Our consultation efforts are summarized below:

Congressional Consultations
Senate House
Senator Ted Stevens
Chairman, Senate Appropriations Committee
Representative C. W. Bill Young
Chairman, Committee on Appropriations
Senator Robert C. Byrd
Ranking Member, Senate Appropriations Committee
Representative David Obey
Ranking Member, Committee on Appropriations
Senator Richard Shelby
Chairman, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury and General Government
Representative Ernest J. Istook
Chairman, House Subcommittee on Transporation, Treasury, and Independent Agencies
Senator Patty Murray
Ranking Member, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury and General Government
Representative John W. Olver
Ranking Member, House Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury, and Independent Agencies
Senator Susan Collins
Chairman, Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs
Representative Tom Davis
Chairman, House Committee on Government Reform
Senator Joseph I. Leiberman
Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs
Representative Henry A. Waxman
Ranking Member, House Committee on Government Reform
  Representative Todd Platts
Chairman, House Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management
  Representative Edolphus Towns
Ranking Member, House Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management

Customers and Stakeholders
Social Security Administration Department of Veterans Affairs
Office of Personnel Management United States Mint
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Railroad Retirement Board
Department of Defense Department of State
Internal Revenue Service U.S. Department of Agriculture
Federal Reserve System National Treasury Employees Union
U.S. Postal Service Department of Homeland Security

   Last Updated:  Friday May 19, 2006

Contact FMS
Treasury E-Government
Privacy Policy
Web Site Inventory/
Publication Schedule
Accessibility/
508 Statement
Freedom of Information Act/
Information Quality
Treasury Department Web Site Treasury No Fear Act Page Regulations.gov USA.gov